Twin Peaks

For posting and critiquing Monochrome images, which the Club defines as: traditional images that are either black and white or sepia, without additional color (prints) or of any single monochromatic tone (digital).

Twin Peaks

Postby acarey » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:27 am

Critique please
Twin Peaks.jpg
acarey
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Twin Peaks

Postby rfreschner » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:57 pm

Austin -

I like the clouds over the mountains and the structure and tones of the barn (house?) and, overall, feel it's a good image. The right side of the image looks a bit crowded to me though with the tall grass, stand of trees, and mountains competing for attention. I might have used a wide angle lens to try and get some separation between these elements, but that would have diminished the impact of the mountains. Maybe a different angle?

P.S. - you might want to post the exif info for those who don't know how to get it.
Rick
"Regret is just a memory written on my brow and there's nothing I can do about it now."
- Willie Nelson
Gear
Image Editing Ok
User avatar
rfreschner
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:21 pm
Image Editing Ok: Yes

Re: Twin Peaks

Postby acarey » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:27 pm

I don't know how to get EXIF data, but in any even, we should encourage members to post the where and how of the image, as well as the post processing techniques use. John has been good about doing that, and if the board members do it, it may remind others to do it as well.

I liked your comments, and have been mulling them over. The separation is more evident in the color version, as you might expect, so I will have to think about how to translate that into B&W. Maybe using a longer lens to narrow the angle of view to the barn and the highest peak would have improved the image.
acarey
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Twin Peaks

Postby rfreschner » Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:43 pm

acarey wrote:I don't know how to get EXIF data


From the exif data I pulled using Exif Viewer in Firefox, it appears that you used Photoshop CS4 to process the image. If you select File Info under the File menu, you can see the IPTC data which has the image information.

According to the info, the image was shot at ISO 200 at f/16 for 1/60 second at a focal length of 60mm using a D700.

but in any even, we should encourage members to post the where and how of the image, as well as the post processing techniques use. John has been good about doing that, and if the board members do it, it may remind others to do it as well.


A good idea.

Maybe using a longer lens to narrow the angle of view to the barn and the highest peak would have improved the image.


Yes and the added compression would make the mountains even more impressive.
Rick
"Regret is just a memory written on my brow and there's nothing I can do about it now."
- Willie Nelson
Gear
Image Editing Ok
User avatar
rfreschner
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:21 pm
Image Editing Ok: Yes

Re: Twin Peaks

Postby dweston » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:54 am

Austin - a great mono shot of Mormon Barns, nice light and conversion...
Don Weston Photography

image editing OK
User avatar
dweston
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:13 am
Image Editing Ok: Yes

Re: Twin Peaks

Postby erosenthal » Sun Feb 21, 2010 1:22 pm

I like the image but would agree with using a wider angle lens from the loation the image was captured or perhaphs a tele (say 200) but from a further and possible higher vantage point.
User avatar
erosenthal
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:05 am
Image Editing Ok: No


Return to Monochrome Critique

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron